The back room of the Pheasant

The Room of the Penal of the National Hearing dictated yesterday a devastating resolution that forces Waiter to Pheasant keep on investigating the tip-off of the bar and that supposes a reverse to the theses of the District attorney's office that had asked in October the judge who should file the cause, with the fallacious argument that the instruction had not achieved to clarify the facts
With this one resolution dismantles the undisguised attempt of Rubalcaba of minimizing the matter with the outlandish idea of that all the members of the network of extortion of ETA were detained later.
What says the National Hearing is something so clear as that, - with independence of this fact - the tip-off was a help act to the band from the interior of the Police and, therefore, a punishable fact for itself that it implies crimes of revelation of secrets and of collaboration with armed gang committed by police officials.
Three magistrates that dictate this mistake urge, also, the instructing judge to practise new tests that it had refused to the popular accusation.
Between them, to call to declare the inspector who realized the internal investigation and who wrote the reports in which one concludes that the tip-off departed from the police dome.
This inspector supports that who gave the order to alert Joseba Elosua, - one of the chiefs of the plot of extortion of ETA - was the ex-general manager of the Police, Víctor García Hidalgo.
Although it turns out to be incredible, this inspector had never been named to declare for the judge Waiter, what reveals his void interest to know the truth of the happened with the "tip-off".
Why, do not they deceive themselves, all the coryphaei and groups of support that him have arisen to Waiter after being imputed by corruption, they do not owe to his attempt of re-opening the Historical Memory or a general, surrealistic cause, against the Franco period.
In fact, the same ones that now support it, are those who crucified it with the GAL.
Of here it talks each other it is of protecting the custodian and guard of the summary that shuts up the biggest scandal of the democracy.
It is a question of protecting and of preventing this summary from falling down in other hands that are not those of Waiter and from being able to stay awake the one who gave the order, who is the Z of this framework.
Of that it talks each other.
Of protecting the owner of the cell who keeps the secret of a Government that collaborated with a terrorist band.
sempietnos@hotmail.com